Yeah, I’m a writer. But just like everyone else, I’m a reader. I also review the things I have written and sometimes, my review doesn’t agree with the others.
I review it honestly, and I hope others do as well.
Face it, some books have obviously fake glowing reviews–we’ve all seen them. After a while, we also get pretty good at spotting them. That’s not the kind of review that anyone wants to agree with, but it’s also not exactly what I’m talking about either.
I’m talking about some obscure (to you) writer who has received glowing reviews about their novel and how innovative, subtle, unique, ground breaking, etc. it is. Sometimes, all of these positive reviews set us up for disappointment, because when we read the book itself, it turns out to be so obscure, odd, and hard to get into that we never do get the point.
Then, we feel stupid or uneducated or just plain dull because we didn’t “get it”. We feel as though we failed on the “worthiness” test.
But is it really us or was the novel so convoluted that it wasn’t our fault we never got the message? Are the glowing reviews more like the case of the emperor’s new clothes rather than us being the dullard?
Review it honestly, state why you disliked the novel or found it tedious to read. This isn’t grade school, there is no red pen, and you aren’t trying to impress a soul with your witty book reviews unless you work for a prestigious newspaper or magazine. You do not have to buy into the emperor’s new clothes!
Unlike our school days, we’re not writing book reports to impress. We are writing book reviews so that other people who are buying books can determine if they are going to like a book before they buy that book. It’s not to leave spoilers either–it’s simply to give your opinion of why someone would or would not like a book. Therefore, be honest, even if you feel like the lone dissenting voice in the crowd of masses who loved it.
Nobody is going to come to your house with a red pen and a glare over your review.
Sure, on occasion, you might get a comment or two about your review, and some of those might be snarky. Snarky is cheap though, and books, even in digital format, really aren’t.
So, with that said, here are some hints for a constructive (though negative) review.
- Be specific about what you hated, whether it was the characters, location, weak plot, editing/proofreading or the narrator’s voice
- You are not attacking the author, and don’t make the review into a personal attack on the the author.
- Try to think of who would like the story. Maybe you didn’t fit that category and that was why you disliked it. Mention the category of reader that you believe it was intended to strike a chord with.
- Never use profanity or slurs to make your point–it turns off everyone.
- Don’t take disagreement with your review personally.
- Be honest but remain polite about your opinion of the book and why it failed to be a hit with you.
- Above all, remember that authors do put their heart and soul into a book, so don’t shred the author just because you hated the book. They may or may not ever see the review!